Priyanshu Shrivastava[1] Background Giving one party the right to appoint an arbitrator of their choice, directly or indirectly, goes...

*Arnav Doshi Introduction The growing tendency of corruption employed as a ground for non-enforcement of arbitral awards has awoken...

An article discussing the conflict between CPC and Arbitration Act relating to stay of enforcement of a domestic arbitration award.

-Rohan Gulati* Introduction & Factual Background Recently, in Kanodia Infrastructure Ltd. v. Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Ltd.[1], the Hon’ble...

Swetalana Rout In a significant ruling of the Supreme Court[1], it has been decided that the scope of power of a Court is limited to the...

Milind Yadav[1] The 2019 amendments to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Arbitration Act”) has helped propel India forward as...

a view taken by the tribunal should not be interfered with, the distinction is drawn between an alternative view and an impossible view

the Court modified the award in favour of the claimant and granted interest pendente lite together with principal amount.

The grant of refund along with eighteen percent rate of interest in addition to the damages by the arbitral tribunal was perverse.

The decision of the Delhi High Court in this case undermines the ability of the parties to tailor the arbitration according to their needs.